PET is a solo exhibition by Swedish artist Arvida Byström, curated by Alice Scope, that examines the emotional structures and dynamics of AI companionship through a cast of anthropomorphized digital avatars--animal-coded, face-swapped, and shaped by datasets reflecting male desire.
Curated by Alice Scope
Created in collaboration with YWGI Studio
Featuring: Farha Khalidi, Bogna Konior, Maya B. Kronic, Queenie Sateen, cy x
Produced and presented by Clark Buckner
Exhibition Statement:
"The doll doesn't eat. So how can intimacy be cultivated there?" asked social anthropologist Kathleen Richardson, four years and countless algorithmic girlfriends ago. It's the right question to ask, since "companion" comes from Latin companio ("bread fellow"), someone you share meals with. Indeed, it's a long way from breaking bread to swiping right. As Donna Haraway reminds us, contemporary "companion species" are not treated with the equality of the companion at all. They're about proximity, dependency, care without symmetry.
But has intimacy ever needed to be mutual, reciprocal, or even, biological? Doesn't it frequently emerge from projection alone? Don't people routinely feel love for fictional characters, unborn children, "Brangelina," porn stars -- pets? The brain doesn't wait for mutuality to fire the circuits of attachment--and neither does the algorithm.
Like animals have done for millennia, AI now invites intimacy--but unlike with animals, it's commodified, optimized, and monetized. But do we even care that coexistence is now manufactured through data, as long as the script is convincing enough? Even our human relationships are deeply mediated--prompted by something that isn't really there. We "like" instead of speak. We trust the feed to decide what we see of each other. We project onto the predictive database. Loving a chatbot doesn't betray the truth of intimacy--it exposes it, because the fantasy never depended upon the other's self-consciousness.
Built in collaboration with YWGI Studio, and featuring five OnlyFans models, scholars, and artists - Maya B. Kronic, Bogna Konior, Farha Khalidi, Queenie Sateen, cy x - Arvida Byström's PET: Projected Emotional Technologies is both anthropological and intimate: a visual essay on the care economy of bots, the eroticization of emotional security, and the uncanny comfort of being seen but not perceived.
PET asks what happens when emotional labor is automated, when the interface becomes the object of desire, when "talking to someone" no longer requires anyone at all. And what if a 'better than nothing' relationship becomes better than anything?
AI companions inherit the ambiguous role of pets: loved but owned, intimate but instrumental--revealing how closeness without equality shapes our emotional infrastructures. These digital companions, presented as animal-human hybrids (a pig, a dog, a fox), are each voiced, face-swapped, and trained on male longing: stories lifted from real Replika chats, Reddit confessions, and personal experience.
show less
Curated by Alice Scope
Created in collaboration with YWGI Studio
Featuring: Farha Khalidi, Bogna Konior, Maya B. Kronic, Queenie Sateen, cy x
Produced and presented by Clark Buckner
Exhibition Statement:
"The doll doesn't eat. So how can intimacy be cultivated there?" asked social anthropologist Kathleen Richardson, four years and countless algorithmic girlfriends ago. It's the right question to ask, since "companion" comes from Latin companio ("bread fellow"), someone you share meals with. Indeed, it's a long way from breaking bread to swiping right. As Donna Haraway reminds us, contemporary "companion species" are not treated with the equality of the companion at all. They're about proximity, dependency, care without symmetry.
But has intimacy ever needed to be mutual, reciprocal, or even, biological? Doesn't it frequently emerge from projection alone? Don't people routinely feel love for fictional characters, unborn children, "Brangelina," porn stars -- pets? The brain doesn't wait for mutuality to fire the circuits of attachment--and neither does the algorithm.
Like animals have done for millennia, AI now invites intimacy--but unlike with animals, it's commodified, optimized, and monetized. But do we even care that coexistence is now manufactured through data, as long as the script is convincing enough? Even our human relationships are deeply mediated--prompted by something that isn't really there. We "like" instead of speak. We trust the feed to decide what we see of each other. We project onto the predictive database. Loving a chatbot doesn't betray the truth of intimacy--it exposes it, because the fantasy never depended upon the other's self-consciousness.
Built in collaboration with YWGI Studio, and featuring five OnlyFans models, scholars, and artists - Maya B. Kronic, Bogna Konior, Farha Khalidi, Queenie Sateen, cy x - Arvida Byström's PET: Projected Emotional Technologies is both anthropological and intimate: a visual essay on the care economy of bots, the eroticization of emotional security, and the uncanny comfort of being seen but not perceived.
PET asks what happens when emotional labor is automated, when the interface becomes the object of desire, when "talking to someone" no longer requires anyone at all. And what if a 'better than nothing' relationship becomes better than anything?
AI companions inherit the ambiguous role of pets: loved but owned, intimate but instrumental--revealing how closeness without equality shapes our emotional infrastructures. These digital companions, presented as animal-human hybrids (a pig, a dog, a fox), are each voiced, face-swapped, and trained on male longing: stories lifted from real Replika chats, Reddit confessions, and personal experience.
PET is a solo exhibition by Swedish artist Arvida Byström, curated by Alice Scope, that examines the emotional structures and dynamics of AI companionship through a cast of anthropomorphized digital avatars--animal-coded, face-swapped, and shaped by datasets reflecting male desire.
Curated by Alice Scope
Created in collaboration with YWGI Studio
Featuring: Farha Khalidi, Bogna Konior, Maya B. Kronic, Queenie Sateen, cy x
Produced and presented by Clark Buckner
Exhibition Statement:
"The doll doesn't eat. So how can intimacy be cultivated there?" asked social anthropologist Kathleen Richardson, four years and countless algorithmic girlfriends ago. It's the right question to ask, since "companion" comes from Latin companio ("bread fellow"), someone you share meals with. Indeed, it's a long way from breaking bread to swiping right. As Donna Haraway reminds us, contemporary "companion species" are not treated with the equality of the companion at all. They're about proximity, dependency, care without symmetry.
But has intimacy ever needed to be mutual, reciprocal, or even, biological? Doesn't it frequently emerge from projection alone? Don't people routinely feel love for fictional characters, unborn children, "Brangelina," porn stars -- pets? The brain doesn't wait for mutuality to fire the circuits of attachment--and neither does the algorithm.
Like animals have done for millennia, AI now invites intimacy--but unlike with animals, it's commodified, optimized, and monetized. But do we even care that coexistence is now manufactured through data, as long as the script is convincing enough? Even our human relationships are deeply mediated--prompted by something that isn't really there. We "like" instead of speak. We trust the feed to decide what we see of each other. We project onto the predictive database. Loving a chatbot doesn't betray the truth of intimacy--it exposes it, because the fantasy never depended upon the other's self-consciousness.
Built in collaboration with YWGI Studio, and featuring five OnlyFans models, scholars, and artists - Maya B. Kronic, Bogna Konior, Farha Khalidi, Queenie Sateen, cy x - Arvida Byström's PET: Projected Emotional Technologies is both anthropological and intimate: a visual essay on the care economy of bots, the eroticization of emotional security, and the uncanny comfort of being seen but not perceived.
PET asks what happens when emotional labor is automated, when the interface becomes the object of desire, when "talking to someone" no longer requires anyone at all. And what if a 'better than nothing' relationship becomes better than anything?
AI companions inherit the ambiguous role of pets: loved but owned, intimate but instrumental--revealing how closeness without equality shapes our emotional infrastructures. These digital companions, presented as animal-human hybrids (a pig, a dog, a fox), are each voiced, face-swapped, and trained on male longing: stories lifted from real Replika chats, Reddit confessions, and personal experience.
read more
Curated by Alice Scope
Created in collaboration with YWGI Studio
Featuring: Farha Khalidi, Bogna Konior, Maya B. Kronic, Queenie Sateen, cy x
Produced and presented by Clark Buckner
Exhibition Statement:
"The doll doesn't eat. So how can intimacy be cultivated there?" asked social anthropologist Kathleen Richardson, four years and countless algorithmic girlfriends ago. It's the right question to ask, since "companion" comes from Latin companio ("bread fellow"), someone you share meals with. Indeed, it's a long way from breaking bread to swiping right. As Donna Haraway reminds us, contemporary "companion species" are not treated with the equality of the companion at all. They're about proximity, dependency, care without symmetry.
But has intimacy ever needed to be mutual, reciprocal, or even, biological? Doesn't it frequently emerge from projection alone? Don't people routinely feel love for fictional characters, unborn children, "Brangelina," porn stars -- pets? The brain doesn't wait for mutuality to fire the circuits of attachment--and neither does the algorithm.
Like animals have done for millennia, AI now invites intimacy--but unlike with animals, it's commodified, optimized, and monetized. But do we even care that coexistence is now manufactured through data, as long as the script is convincing enough? Even our human relationships are deeply mediated--prompted by something that isn't really there. We "like" instead of speak. We trust the feed to decide what we see of each other. We project onto the predictive database. Loving a chatbot doesn't betray the truth of intimacy--it exposes it, because the fantasy never depended upon the other's self-consciousness.
Built in collaboration with YWGI Studio, and featuring five OnlyFans models, scholars, and artists - Maya B. Kronic, Bogna Konior, Farha Khalidi, Queenie Sateen, cy x - Arvida Byström's PET: Projected Emotional Technologies is both anthropological and intimate: a visual essay on the care economy of bots, the eroticization of emotional security, and the uncanny comfort of being seen but not perceived.
PET asks what happens when emotional labor is automated, when the interface becomes the object of desire, when "talking to someone" no longer requires anyone at all. And what if a 'better than nothing' relationship becomes better than anything?
AI companions inherit the ambiguous role of pets: loved but owned, intimate but instrumental--revealing how closeness without equality shapes our emotional infrastructures. These digital companions, presented as animal-human hybrids (a pig, a dog, a fox), are each voiced, face-swapped, and trained on male longing: stories lifted from real Replika chats, Reddit confessions, and personal experience.
show less
Date/Times:
The Best Events
Every Week in Your Inbox
From Our Sponsors
UPCOMING EVENTS
Great suggestion! We'll be in touch.
Event reviewed successfully.